Funny Stuff is all around

Which Is Better For The Public: Trickle Down Or Trickle Up?

For quite some time now the world’s financial system has been fragile. The Federal Reserve Chairperson, Ben S. Bernanke is inundated with a dilemma in the wide ranged credit freeze surrounding today’s financial institutions. This problem goes far outside what interest rate cuts can mend in the economy.

The very low interest rates we experienced in the early to mid 2000’s as well as the trend of throwing caution to the wind has left the financial world at risk. This care free attitude was spread by Alan Greenspan; a major Wall Street player who was bailed out of trouble with borrowed funds, has led us down a dangerous path.

Now there’s a problem. Those speculative derivatives do not have the value that the Wall Street salesmen claimed they had. There’s a desperate race to de-leverage at almost any price. Of course, buyers have grown scarce. No institutional investor wants to add more highly overvalued speculative package to his portfolio now that the true value of these packages is exposed in the light of day. We are in a liquidity crisis the magnitude of which we haven’t seen since before World War II.

Commercial and investment banks sitting on overvalued and illiquid assets such as mortgages and private equity loans can’t sell them because they are packaged with derivatives of highly questionable value (a polite way of saying that Wall Street lied about their true value and overpriced them by billions and billions of dollars). The net result is that they don’t have the cash with which to make new loans. This lack of liquidity is killing our credit based economy. Moreover, for banks and brokers to strengthen their balance sheets by de-leveraging, it would require banks to reduce the number of loans on their books. This would devastate the economy and make what might be only a bad recession into one far, far worse and longer-lasting.

This is why the Federal Reserve is bailing out banks with long term financing at low prices. What other option is there? Either let the entire financial infrastructure of the world freeze up or they lend money to financial institutions and accept the subprime mortgages and related securities of debatable value as collateral. This is how the Federal Reserve has become the buyer of last resort which is incredibly inflationary. These financial middlemen are projected to take the cash borrowed from the Federal Reserve and lend it out again to higher quality borrowers; unfortunately this is not what is happening. Theoretically, this would be considered the trickle-down effect.

So why don’t we try a trickle-up effect? The bailout will cost at least $1,000,000,000,000. Not sure of that number? That would be one trillion dollars! Instead of giving one trillion dollars of newly created money to the Wall Street players to continue the financial problems we already are facing, why not give that money to the people of America? It will then trickle-up to the Wall Street by stimulating the economy. By giving around $3,200 to every individual in America we may be able to get the money flow back in the right direction. This would mean a family of five would receive $16,000.

This would help all of America individually as well as the economy. First time home buyers would actually have enough for a down payment, thereby helping the real estate crisis. In doing this everyone is helped instead of a few Wall Street fat cats. Why is it they should receive a trillion dollars of new money to throw around and devalue like they have in the past? After all, Wall Street’s abuse of derivatives and outright greed is what got us into this financial crisis in the first place.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Related posts

• No related posts.